Gornahoor

Liber esse, scientiam acquirere, veritatem loqui

Random thoughts on Chivalry

Jan van Eyck Knights of Christ
Some notes from reading the highly recommended history of medieval knighthood Chivalry by Maurice Keen. Since Medieval Europe was the last great Traditional Indo-European civilisation, it is well worth the study. As it is recent in time to us, we can trace its origins and development directly from the sources, without the need to rely on ancient myths. In particular, the system of chivalry developed out of earlier Roman and Germanic traditions. The intellectual foundations of chivalry can be traced directly to their understanding, and often creative re-interpretations, of Roman, Greek, and Trojan warriors, such as Hector, Alexander, Scipio, Julius Caesar, and Vegetius.

On the self-development of the Kshatriya caste.

Classical ethics, classical jurisprudence and classical philosophy, though by no means irreconcilable with Christian thought and exercising a powerful influence upon it, belonged to a pre-Christian tradition. Chivalry was thus reminded, forcefully, of the separation of the origins of its institutions from those of the priesthood, and of the original independence of its function — within the broad framework of divine providence — from the priestly one. ~ from Chivalry

Chivalry by Maurice Keen
A knight was expected to be courteous, loyal, nobly spoken, well clad, generous, sincere, humble, truthful, and valiant. He protected the weak, defended the faith, had a taste for adventure, and composed poems for his lady love.We can see the beginning of sports leagues in the Medieval tournaments, as they pitted one township or region against another and flew their own colours. The knights would contend for fame and fortune, although defeat could bring death, serious injury, or financial ruin. The aristocracy would “scout” for the best knights to recruit for their own militias. If a knight lost a joust in a contest, he could expect to lose his horse to his opponent. He might also be captured by the victor and held for ransom. And we think football players are tough guys. The women admired their knights and inspired them to greater deeds. Some even pledged to marry the victors. Yes, it is true, in those days that was considered a reward, especially since it often meant “marrying up” in class.

The Three Matters

There were three things that “mattered” to the knight of the Middle Ages:

  • The matter of Britain.
    The “matter of Britain” relates to King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table.
  • The matter of France.
    The “matter of France” is about Emperor Charlemagne and his paladins.
  • The matter of Rome.
    The “matter of Rome” concerns the ancient Roman empire while also encompassing ancient Troy and Greece.

These matters were the subject matter for the epic poems of the era. Compare that to what “matters” to today’s “man”, even in the so-called “manosphere”.

Boucicaut

Boucicaut was a knight inspired by the chaste love of his lady. He wrote poetry and exercised regularly to keep fit. He could do a somersault in full armour, vault fully armed onto his horse, and climb up the reverse side of ladder in armour, using only his hands. Boucicaut learned from Vegetius, Scipio, and Demosthenes. He permitted no loose women around the camp, deplored drunkenness, and was a stern disciplinarian. He learned eloquence to rouse his men to action and to explain himself to subject people.


Posted

in

,

by

Tags:

Comments

8 responses to “Random thoughts on Chivalry”

  1. […] changes of keeping Easter after the Roman fashion in the seventh century – bringing with it the Matters of Britain, France and Rome, as well as opening it to Cistercian and Scholastic thought (see St. Bernard, Saint Thomas et […]

  2. […] patriarcal et masculin. Quelqu’un peut-il accuser Constantin, Clovis, Charlemagne, Arthur, ou Boucicaut d’être féminin ? En outre, les médiévaux ont admiré les grands guerriers païens comme […]

  3. […] itself patriarchal and masculine. Can anyone accuse Constantine, Clovis, Charlemagne, Arthur, or Boucicaut of being feminine. Moreover, the medievals admired the great pagan warriors like Hector, Alexander, […]

  4. […] of the contemplative thinker, the knight became the new elite. The knight was distinguished by his physical strength and martial prowess. The knight acted according to the ethical will of […]

  5. […] of the contemplative thinker, the knight became the new elite. The knight was distinguished by his physical strength and martial prowess. The knight acted according to the ethical will of […]

  6. […] connected with the real or legendary figures of great rulers, from Alexander the Great to King Arthur and Emperor Frederick II. Authors of the Middle Ages could not imagine Christendom without an […]

  7. […] have made available several posts about actually existing knightly orders, for example here. Notice the profound difference in values from what Evola proposes. I suggest that anyone […]

  8. GFJF Avatar

    Could you briefly address the symbolism in Chivalry of the horse?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.